Report from an avalanche accident during a film production in Sunnmøre

Report from an avalanche accident during a film production in Sunnmøre

A skier-triggered slab avalanche during a ski film production in Sunnmøre: what happened, the rescue, and our learning points.

Background

A nearby weather station reported 76 mm of precipitation in the last 24 hours. The avalanche danger level was 3 (considerable), with the main problem being a weak layer of new snow above 600 masl in N, E, and S aspects.

The group consisted of 2 athletes, 1 cameraman, 1 director, 1 intern, and 1 guide.

Earlier that day, the group had been skiing and filming in NW- and W-facing terrain with significant amounts of new snow. The group have been out skiing together 2 days before this too, parts of the group new each other from before.

Incident description

On the way back, the guide decided to hike slightly higher to gain more speed for a long, flat section in the forest. The group consisted of both skiers and snowboarders, and there was concern about maintaining enough speed to exit the valley efficiently.

The plan was also to capture some final close-up powder shots on a short, steeper section before returning to the van and wrapping up the day. This was the third consecutive day the group had been skiing together. Some members knew each other from before, while others did not.

Below the steeper face, there was a plateau intended as a regrouping point before exiting via the safest route. One location, marked by a bush, was identified as a safe spot. Below the plateau, the terrain steepened significantly into cliffs.

‍

Figure 1. Where everyone stood when the slab released, and where the director and Athlete 1 stopped. Seen from below, not to scale.

The director first skied down to the left side of the slope, in a concave feature. The cameraman followed to find a suitable filming position. The intern then skied down to skier’s left of the director and cameraman.

Athlete 1 descended next, skiing the steeper convex part of the slope, making several deep turns in front of the camera, and continued down to the designated safe spot by the bushes.

Athlete 2 then skied the slope, slightly to the side of Athlete 1’s line. After a few turns, an avalanche was triggered. The crown propagated upward toward the media team. Athlete 2 managed to ski out of the avalanche to the left.

The intern and cameraman had the crown fracture approximately one meter above them and were carried 1–2 meters before stopping. The director moved left toward the center of the avalanche path and was caught.

As the avalanche moved over the plateau, it slowed down but continued toward Athlete 1, who was positioned at the safe spot. Both the director and Athlete 1 were eventually carried over the edge and down the steeper terrain below.

When the slab passed over the plateau, it entrained loose snow further downslope. There was no slab or crown in this section, only loose snow movement.



Figure 2. Overview of the day's GPS tracks (blue) on a slope steepness map. Colours: green 27–30°, yellow 30–35°, orange 35–40°, red 40–50°, dark red over 50°. [Map source]

Figure 3. Detail of the avalanche slope. Green circles: [upper = release, lower = End point of taken person].

Rescue

The guide instructed everyone to switch their transceivers to search mode and skied down to the plateau. Athlete 2 and the intern joined the signal search. At this point, neither of the two buried individuals was visible.

After approximately 15 seconds, the guide and Athlete 2 visually located both individuals. Athlete 1 was on the surface, and the director was partially buried but responsive.

The guide communicated to the group that both individuals had been found. Athlete 2 skied down quickly to assist Athlete 1 in digging out the director. Due to the steep terrain, the guide decided to safely guide the cameraman and intern down to avoid further exposure.

The group regrouped at the director’s location and conducted a full check to confirm that no one was injured. The only physical losses were one ski and a pair of poles.

The total time from the start of the search until everyone was safely at the bottom was approximately 6 minutes.

Context

In film productions like this, there is often a higher acceptance of risk, both in terrain choice and how the group moves within it.

In a guided setting, it would not be acceptable to have multiple people exposed in the slope simultaneously while others are skiing. However, this is sometimes necessary to capture the desired footage. Similarly, the terrain skied in film productions often exceeds what would be appropriate for guided clients.

At the same time, it is important to remain transparent about the inherent risks of off-piste skiing. While guides can reduce risk significantly, it can never be eliminated entirely. It is also important to recognize that risks are not limited to avalanches—other types of injuries are more frequent.

The group had relevant information about the unstable snowpack but still ended up in this terrain. This raises important questions about decision-making.

Learning points

Rescue efficiency through training

Strong avalanche training made the rescue fast and effective. The group was able to act immediately without hesitation. This highlights the importance of regular training, ideally at the start of every season.

A common issue occurred: one person initially forgot to switch their transceiver to search mode. This was quickly corrected and did not affect the outcome, but it reinforces how critical this step is and why it´s often mentioned as one of the common mistakes on companion rescue.

Transition into more exposed terrain

The group started the day in less loaded aspects (NW/W) but later moved into more avalanche-prone terrain (N/E/S above 600 masl) without a clear reassessment.

This type of terrain was already a no-go zone and the guide shouldn´t have entered here with the group.

Impact of filming on decision-making

Filming requirements increase risk acceptance and influence both terrain selection and group movement.

This should be explicitly addressed before entering terrain:

  • What level of risk is acceptable today?
  • Are we still within that limit?

Multiple people exposed simultaneously

Having several people positioned in or below the slope increased the potential consequences significantly.

Even in a filming context, exposure should be minimized as much as possible.

At the same time most of the group was placed at good spots with the cameraman & intern just carried a couple of meters. The safe spot for the first athlete were really close to not get caught at all. This athlete was on snowboard and didn´t have the chance to move sideways and should have been instructed to stop even further out to the side.

Influence of exceptional conditions

After a very dry season, the large snowfall created exceptional skiing conditions. This likely influenced decision-making and increased risk tolerance.

Good conditions can negatively impact critical thinking and must be actively accounted for.

Gap between knowledge and action

The group had relevant information about unstable conditions but still entered terrain where the avalanche problem was present.

This highlights a gap between understanding the conditions and applying that knowledge in decision-making. The strong skiing ability within the group likely influenced the guide’s decision, as high competence can shift focus toward what is possible to ski, rather than what is appropriate given the conditions.

Conclusion / Summary

This incident highlights how multiple small decisions can combine into a high-consequence situation.

Despite having relevant information about unstable conditions, the guide entered terrain with the group where the avalanche problem was present. Factors such as strong skiing ability, filming objectives, and exceptional snow conditions likely influenced this decision.

The outcome was largely positive due to effective training and a fast, well-executed rescue. However, the event reinforces the importance of continuous reassessment, clear communication when terrain exposure increases, and minimizing group exposure—even in a filming context.

The expression ”avalanches don´t know you are an expert” feels appropriate here. The team had initially planned for a shorter day that later ended up to be a longer day, this was influencing the decision making when ”just” make a short run back to the car. This was even pulled out from the guide in front of the event, ”maybe a bit unnecessary to push even more on this final run”, indeed it was.

On our guided ski touring trips we aim to always do a training session with companion rescue. One of the reasons to this is that it highlights the consecvence with avalanches and normally gives the guide more understanding for hers/his decision making during the day. This is something we normally don´t do with these kind of groups because it´s a common understanding that this kind of individuals often have more avalanche training then our normal customers. Of course it´s also affected by ”time is money”, we have a production running here and need to produce content not train on avalanche rescue. Anyway we can clearly see here that the overall high knowledge about companion rescue had a positive outcome on the event.

‍

No items found.
calendar icon
Published
November 5, 2026
calendar icon
Last edited
November 5, 2026